Side by sideSuburb comparison

Clarence Gardens vs Clarence Park.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,486,327 and $1,561,000.

Clarence Gardens (median $1,486,327) is roughly 5% cheaper to buy into than Clarence Park ($1,561,000). Over the past year, Clarence Gardens (+35.4%) ran 11.5 percentage points ahead of Clarence Park (+23.9%) on house-price growth.

Clarence Park scores higher on walkability (32/100 vs 60/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Clarence Park (1116) sits above Clarence Gardens (1078).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Clarence Gardens is the lower entry point at $1,486,327 median, 5% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Clarence Gardens carries both higher gross yield (2.24% vs 2.24%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Clarence Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1116 vs 1078). Clarence Gardens also has a higher family-household share (74% vs 62%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsClarence Gardens vs Clarence Park

Common questions

Is Clarence Gardens or Clarence Park cheaper to buy in?

Clarence Gardens has the lower median house price at $1,486,327, roughly 5% below Clarence Park ($1,561,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Clarence Gardens or Clarence Park?

Over the past 12 months, Clarence Gardens grew +35.4% vs +23.9% in Clarence Park, a gap of 11.5 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Clarence Gardens or Clarence Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Clarence Park scores 1116 vs 1078 in Clarence Gardens. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Clarence Gardens or Clarence Park?

Clarence Park scores 60/100 on walkability vs 32/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Clarence Gardens or Clarence Park?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.24% in Clarence Gardens vs 2.24% in Clarence Park. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Clarence Gardens
Metric
Clarence Park

Price & Market

$1,486,327
Median house
$1,561,000
$288,720
Median unit
$333,360
+35.4%
Annual growth (house)
+23.9%
Days on market

Rental

$640/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$672/wk
$550/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$490/wk
75.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
21.0%
Renter occupied
31.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

32
Walk score
60
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
2,373
Population
2,658
38
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1078
Avg ICSEA
1116

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).