Clemton Park vs Belmore.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Clemton Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Clemton Park scores higher on walkability (46/100 vs 14/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Clemton Park (1046) sits above Belmore (1012). Clemton Park skews owner-occupied (71%), Belmore runs more rental-dense (53% owner).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Clemton Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1046 vs 1012).
Common questions
Does Clemton Park or Belmore have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Clemton Park scores 1046 vs 1012 in Belmore. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Clemton Park or Belmore?
Clemton Park scores 46/100 on walkability vs 14/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Clemton Park against another suburb