Side by sideSuburb comparison

Coalstoun Lakes vs Ginoondan.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ginoondan edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ginoondan (953) sits above Coalstoun Lakes (951). Ginoondan skews owner-occupied (100%), Coalstoun Lakes runs more rental-dense (80% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ginoondan edges out on average school ICSEA (953 vs 951). Ginoondan also has a higher family-household share (200% vs 80%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCoalstoun Lakes vs Ginoondan

Common questions

Does Coalstoun Lakes or Ginoondan have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ginoondan scores 953 vs 951 in Coalstoun Lakes. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Coalstoun Lakes
Metric
Ginoondan

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$228/wk
$185/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$100/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
15.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
99
Population
12
44
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
4
951
Avg ICSEA
953

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).