Side by sideSuburb comparison

Coalstoun Lakes vs Stockhaven.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Coalstoun Lakes edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coalstoun Lakes (951) sits above Stockhaven (949).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Coalstoun Lakes edges out on average school ICSEA (951 vs 949).

Common questionsCoalstoun Lakes vs Stockhaven

Common questions

Does Coalstoun Lakes or Stockhaven have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coalstoun Lakes scores 951 vs 949 in Stockhaven. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Coalstoun Lakes
Metric
Stockhaven

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$228/wk
$185/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$194/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
15.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
99
Population
6
44
Median age
73

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
7
951
Avg ICSEA
949

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).