Codrington vs Ruthven

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Codrington (946) sits above Ruthven (945). Codrington skews owner-occupied (114%), Ruthven runs more rental-dense (76% owner).

Buying in Codrington or Ruthven?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Codrington? The free selling guide

Codrington and Ruthven side by side

MeasureCodringtonRuthven
Renting
House rent–$620/wk
Unit rent–$435/wk
Owner occupied114.0%76.0%
Renter occupied14.0%10.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA946945
Lifestyle and people
Walk score0–
Transit score0–
Bike score0–
Population83114
Median age4240
Climate
Annual rainfall1181 mm1181 mm
Mean max, January29.9°C29.9°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Codrington edges out on average school ICSEA (946 vs 945). Codrington also has a higher family-household share (129% vs 100%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Codrington vs Ruthven: common questions

Does Codrington or Ruthven have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Codrington scores 946 vs 945 in Ruthven. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.