Side by sideSuburb comparison

Codrington vs South Gundurimba.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. South Gundurimba edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving South Gundurimba (967) sits above Codrington (946). Codrington skews owner-occupied (114%), South Gundurimba runs more rental-dense (80% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

South Gundurimba edges out on average school ICSEA (967 vs 946). Codrington also has a higher family-household share (129% vs 68%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCodrington vs South Gundurimba

Common questions

Does Codrington or South Gundurimba have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), South Gundurimba scores 967 vs 946 in Codrington. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Codrington
Metric
South Gundurimba

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$310/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
114.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
14.0%
Renter occupied
17.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
83
Population
355
42
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
12
946
Avg ICSEA
967

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).