Side by sideSuburb comparison

Eden Hills vs Coromandel Valley.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,262,550 and $1,210,000. Coromandel Valley edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Coromandel Valley (median $1,210,000) is roughly 4% cheaper to buy into than Eden Hills ($1,262,550). Over the past year, Coromandel Valley (+24.7%) ran 24.7 percentage points ahead of Eden Hills (0%) on house-price growth.

Coromandel Valley scores higher on walkability (6/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Eden Hills (1089) sits above Coromandel Valley (1078).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Coromandel Valley is the lower entry point at $1,210,000 median, 4% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Eden Hills delivers the better gross yield (2.68% vs 2.56%), but Coromandel Valley has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Eden Hills edges out on average school ICSEA (1089 vs 1078).

Common questionsEden Hills vs Coromandel Valley

Common questions

Is Eden Hills or Coromandel Valley cheaper to buy in?

Coromandel Valley has the lower median house price at $1,210,000, roughly 4% below Eden Hills ($1,262,550). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Eden Hills or Coromandel Valley?

Over the past 12 months, Coromandel Valley grew +24.7% vs 0% in Eden Hills, a gap of 24.7 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Eden Hills or Coromandel Valley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Eden Hills scores 1089 vs 1078 in Coromandel Valley. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Eden Hills or Coromandel Valley?

Coromandel Valley scores 8/100 on walkability vs 6/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Eden Hills or Coromandel Valley?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.68% in Eden Hills vs 2.56% in Coromandel Valley. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Eden Hills
Metric
Coromandel Valley

Price & Market

$1,262,550
Median house
$1,210,000
$285,120
Median unit
$308,880
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+24.7%
Days on market

Rental

$650/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$595/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$420/wk
87.0%
Owner occupied
92.0%
12.0%
Renter occupied
8.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

6
Walk score
8
0
Transit score
0
20
Bike score
100
3,020
Population
4,380
43
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1089
Avg ICSEA
1078

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).