Fairfield Heights vs Canley Heights.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Canley Heights edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Canley Heights scores higher on walkability (20/100 vs 80/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Canley Heights (955) sits above Fairfield Heights (941).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Canley Heights edges out on average school ICSEA (955 vs 941).
Common questions
Does Fairfield Heights or Canley Heights have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Canley Heights scores 955 vs 941 in Fairfield Heights. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Fairfield Heights or Canley Heights?
Canley Heights scores 80/100 on walkability vs 20/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Fairfield Heights against another suburb