Side by sideSuburb comparison

Falconer vs Oban.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Falconer edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Falconer (955) sits above Oban (907).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Falconer edges out on average school ICSEA (955 vs 907).

Common questionsFalconer vs Oban

Common questions

Does Falconer or Oban have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Falconer scores 955 vs 907 in Oban. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Falconer
Metric
Oban

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
79.0%
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
52
Population
7
46
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
7
955
Avg ICSEA
907

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).