Fishermans Reach vs South West Rocks.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.
South West Rocks scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 54/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Fishermans Reach (942) sits above South West Rocks (940). South West Rocks skews owner-occupied (73%), Fishermans Reach runs more rental-dense (54% owner).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Fishermans Reach edges out on average school ICSEA (942 vs 940). South West Rocks also has a higher family-household share (66% vs 47%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Common questions
Does Fishermans Reach or South West Rocks have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Fishermans Reach scores 942 vs 940 in South West Rocks. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Fishermans Reach or South West Rocks?
South West Rocks scores 54/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Fishermans Reach against another suburb