Fulham Gardens vs Kidman Park.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,440,000 and $1,217,500.
Kidman Park (median $1,217,500) is roughly 18% cheaper to buy into than Fulham Gardens ($1,440,000). Over the past year, Fulham Gardens (+20.3%) ran 2.1 percentage points ahead of Kidman Park (+18.2%) on house-price growth.
Fulham Gardens scores higher on walkability (16/100 vs 12/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kidman Park (1057) sits above Fulham Gardens (1053).
For buyers
Kidman Park is the lower entry point at $1,217,500 median, 18% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Kidman Park delivers the better gross yield (3.03% vs 2.89%), but Fulham Gardens has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.
For families
Kidman Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1057 vs 1053).
Common questions
Is Fulham Gardens or Kidman Park cheaper to buy in?
Kidman Park has the lower median house price at $1,217,500, roughly 18% below Fulham Gardens ($1,440,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Which has stronger property growth, Fulham Gardens or Kidman Park?
Over the past 12 months, Fulham Gardens grew +20.3% vs +18.2% in Kidman Park, a gap of 2.1 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.
Does Fulham Gardens or Kidman Park have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kidman Park scores 1057 vs 1053 in Fulham Gardens. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Fulham Gardens or Kidman Park?
Fulham Gardens scores 16/100 on walkability vs 12/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
Which suburb has higher rental yield, Fulham Gardens or Kidman Park?
Gross rental yield on houses is 3.03% in Kidman Park vs 2.89% in Fulham Gardens. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Fulham Gardens against another suburb