Side by sideSuburb comparison

Fulham Gardens vs Seaton.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,440,000 and $1,077,000.

Seaton (median $1,077,000) is roughly 34% cheaper to buy into than Fulham Gardens ($1,440,000). Over the past year, Fulham Gardens (+20.3%) ran 6.8 percentage points ahead of Seaton (+13.5%) on house-price growth.

Seaton scores higher on walkability (16/100 vs 28/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Fulham Gardens (1053) sits above Seaton (1043). Fulham Gardens skews owner-occupied (75%), Seaton runs more rental-dense (60% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Seaton is the lower entry point at $1,077,000 median, 34% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Seaton delivers the better gross yield (3.21% vs 2.89%), but Fulham Gardens has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Fulham Gardens edges out on average school ICSEA (1053 vs 1043). Fulham Gardens also has a higher family-household share (74% vs 63%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsFulham Gardens vs Seaton

Common questions

Is Fulham Gardens or Seaton cheaper to buy in?

Seaton has the lower median house price at $1,077,000, roughly 34% below Fulham Gardens ($1,440,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Fulham Gardens or Seaton?

Over the past 12 months, Fulham Gardens grew +20.3% vs +13.5% in Seaton, a gap of 6.8 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Fulham Gardens or Seaton have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Fulham Gardens scores 1053 vs 1043 in Seaton. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Fulham Gardens or Seaton?

Seaton scores 28/100 on walkability vs 16/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Fulham Gardens or Seaton?

Gross rental yield on houses is 3.21% in Seaton vs 2.89% in Fulham Gardens. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Fulham Gardens
Metric
Seaton

Price & Market

$1,440,000
Median house
$1,077,000
$316,800
Median unit
$271,440
+20.3%
Annual growth (house)
+13.5%
Days on market

Rental

$800/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$665/wk
$485/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$485/wk
75.0%
Owner occupied
60.0%
22.0%
Renter occupied
36.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

16
Walk score
28
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
6,573
Population
10,877
45
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1053
Avg ICSEA
1043

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).