Side by sideSuburb comparison

Glenreagh vs Lower Bucca.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Glenreagh scores higher on walkability (10/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lower Bucca (957) sits above Glenreagh (940).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lower Bucca edges out on average school ICSEA (957 vs 940).

Common questionsGlenreagh vs Lower Bucca

Common questions

Does Glenreagh or Lower Bucca have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lower Bucca scores 957 vs 940 in Glenreagh. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Glenreagh or Lower Bucca?

Glenreagh scores 10/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Glenreagh
Metric
Lower Bucca

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$370/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$370/wk
$330/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$315/wk
83.0%
Owner occupied
13.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

10
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,005
Population
47,335
39
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
940
Avg ICSEA
957

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).