Side by sideSuburb comparison

Green Fields vs Parafield Gardens.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $911,000 and $875,500.

Parafield Gardens (median $875,500) is roughly 4% cheaper to buy into than Green Fields ($911,000). Over the past year, Parafield Gardens (+25.1%) ran 25.1 percentage points ahead of Green Fields (0%) on house-price growth.

Green Fields scores higher on walkability (12/100 vs 6/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Green Fields (970) sits above Parafield Gardens (967). Green Fields skews owner-occupied (88%), Parafield Gardens runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Parafield Gardens is the lower entry point at $875,500 median, 4% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Parafield Gardens carries both higher gross yield (3.56% vs 1.71%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Green Fields edges out on average school ICSEA (970 vs 967).

Common questionsGreen Fields vs Parafield Gardens

Common questions

Is Green Fields or Parafield Gardens cheaper to buy in?

Parafield Gardens has the lower median house price at $875,500, roughly 4% below Green Fields ($911,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Green Fields or Parafield Gardens?

Over the past 12 months, Parafield Gardens grew +25.1% vs 0% in Green Fields, a gap of 25.1 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Green Fields or Parafield Gardens have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Green Fields scores 970 vs 967 in Parafield Gardens. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Green Fields or Parafield Gardens?

Green Fields scores 12/100 on walkability vs 6/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Green Fields or Parafield Gardens?

Gross rental yield on houses is 3.56% in Parafield Gardens vs 1.71% in Green Fields. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Green Fields
Metric
Parafield Gardens

Price & Market

$911,000
Median house
$875,500
$218,880
Median unit
$218,880
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+25.1%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$600/wk
$323/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$475/wk
88.0%
Owner occupied
68.0%
5.0%
Renter occupied
28.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

12
Walk score
6
0
Transit score
30
100
Bike score
100
170
Population
18,467
35
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
970
Avg ICSEA
967

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).