Green Fields vs Mawson Lakes
Mawson Lakes scores higher on walkability (12/100 vs 36/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mawson Lakes (982) sits above Green Fields (970). Green Fields skews owner-occupied (88%), Mawson Lakes runs more rental-dense (59% owner).
Buying in Green Fields or Mawson Lakes?
Selling in Green Fields? The free selling guide
Green Fields and Mawson Lakes side by side
| Measure | Green Fields | Mawson Lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Price and market | ||
| Median house | – | $920,000 |
| Median unit | – | $240,480 |
| House price change, 12 months | – | +9.5% |
| Renting | ||
| House rent | $600/wk | $650/wk |
| Unit rent | $323/wk | $550/wk |
| Owner occupied | 88.0% | 59.0% |
| Renter occupied | 5.0% | 39.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 20 | 20 |
| Average ICSEA | 970 | 982 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 12 | 36 |
| Transit score | 0 | 60 |
| Bike score | 100 | 100 |
| Population | 170 | 13,794 |
| Median age | 35 | 33 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 424 mm | 424 mm |
| Mean max, January | 30.5°C | 30.5°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Mawson Lakes edges out on average school ICSEA (982 vs 970). Green Fields also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 70%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Green Fields vs Mawson Lakes: common questions
Does Green Fields or Mawson Lakes have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mawson Lakes scores 982 vs 970 in Green Fields. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Green Fields or Mawson Lakes?
Mawson Lakes scores 36/100 on walkability vs 12/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
Keep comparing
Compare Green Fields with
Choosing between Green Fields and Mawson Lakes?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.