Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gymea vs Sylvania Waters.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,842,000 and $2,205,000. Gymea edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Gymea (median $1,842,000) is roughly 16% cheaper to buy into than Sylvania Waters ($2,205,000). Over the past year, Gymea (+1.2%) ran 12.6 percentage points ahead of Sylvania Waters (-11.4%) on house-price growth.

Gymea scores higher on walkability (42/100 vs 40/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Gymea (1075) sits above Sylvania Waters (1069). Sylvania Waters skews owner-occupied (82%), Gymea runs more rental-dense (66% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Gymea is the lower entry point at $1,842,000 median, 16% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Sylvania Waters delivers the better gross yield (3.07% vs 2.87%), but Gymea has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Gymea edges out on average school ICSEA (1075 vs 1069). Sylvania Waters also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsGymea vs Sylvania Waters

Common questions

Is Gymea or Sylvania Waters cheaper to buy in?

Gymea has the lower median house price at $1,842,000, roughly 16% below Sylvania Waters ($2,205,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Gymea or Sylvania Waters?

Over the past 12 months, Gymea grew +1.2% vs -11.4% in Sylvania Waters, a gap of 12.6 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Gymea or Sylvania Waters have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Gymea scores 1075 vs 1069 in Sylvania Waters. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Gymea or Sylvania Waters?

Gymea scores 42/100 on walkability vs 40/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Gymea or Sylvania Waters?

Gross rental yield on houses is 3.07% in Sylvania Waters vs 2.87% in Gymea. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Gymea
Metric
Sylvania Waters

Price & Market

$1,842,000
Median house
$2,205,000
$446,400
Median unit
$446,400
+1.2%
Annual growth (house)
-11.4%
Days on market

Rental

$1015/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$1300/wk
$750/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$695/wk
66.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
32.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

42
Walk score
40
20
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
8,219
Population
3,200
39
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1075
Avg ICSEA
1069

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).