Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kearsley vs Cessnock.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $730,000 and $669,000.

Cessnock (median $669,000) is roughly 9% cheaper to buy into than Kearsley ($730,000). Over the past year, Kearsley (+24.8%) ran 17.8 percentage points ahead of Cessnock (+7%) on house-price growth.

Cessnock scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 36/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kearsley (922) sits above Cessnock (919). Kearsley skews owner-occupied (85%), Cessnock runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Cessnock is the lower entry point at $669,000 median, 9% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Cessnock delivers the better gross yield (4.59% vs 4.20%), but Kearsley has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Kearsley edges out on average school ICSEA (922 vs 919).

Common questionsKearsley vs Cessnock

Common questions

Is Kearsley or Cessnock cheaper to buy in?

Cessnock has the lower median house price at $669,000, roughly 9% below Kearsley ($730,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Kearsley or Cessnock?

Over the past 12 months, Kearsley grew +24.8% vs +7% in Cessnock, a gap of 17.8 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Kearsley or Cessnock have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kearsley scores 922 vs 919 in Cessnock. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Kearsley or Cessnock?

Cessnock scores 36/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Kearsley or Cessnock?

Gross rental yield on houses is 4.59% in Cessnock vs 4.20% in Kearsley. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Kearsley
Metric
Cessnock

Price & Market

$730,000
Median house
$669,000
$242,640
Median unit
$520,000
+24.8%
Annual growth (house)
+7.0%
Days on market

Rental

$590/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$590/wk
$480/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$480/wk
85.0%
Owner occupied
59.0%
14.0%
Renter occupied
38.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
36
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
100
838
Population
16,300
38
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
14
922
Avg ICSEA
919

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).