Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kelly vs Kimba.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Kimba skews owner-occupied (76%), Kelly runs more rental-dense (25% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kelly has a heavier family-household mix (75% vs 64%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Kelly
Metric
Kimba

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$150/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$150/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$85/wk
25.0%
Owner occupied
76.0%
20.0%
Renter occupied
21.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
48
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
59
Population
608
35
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
1
992
Avg ICSEA
992

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).