Kilsyth vs Montrose.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $837,500 and $985,000. Montrose edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Kilsyth (median $837,500) is roughly 15% cheaper to buy into than Montrose ($985,000).
Montrose scores higher on walkability (30/100 vs 36/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Montrose (1025) sits above Kilsyth (1008).
For buyers
Kilsyth is the lower entry point at $837,500 median, 15% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Montrose edges out on average school ICSEA (1025 vs 1008).
Common questions
Is Kilsyth or Montrose cheaper to buy in?
Kilsyth has the lower median house price at $837,500, roughly 15% below Montrose ($985,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Does Kilsyth or Montrose have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Montrose scores 1025 vs 1008 in Kilsyth. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Kilsyth or Montrose?
Montrose scores 36/100 on walkability vs 30/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Kilsyth against another suburb