Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kingsland vs Spring Mountain.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kingsland edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kingsland (899) sits above Spring Mountain (898). Kingsland skews owner-occupied (71%), Spring Mountain runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kingsland edges out on average school ICSEA (899 vs 898).

Common questionsKingsland vs Spring Mountain

Common questions

Does Kingsland or Spring Mountain have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kingsland scores 899 vs 898 in Spring Mountain. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kingsland
Metric
Spring Mountain

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$225/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$270/wk
$100/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$274/wk
71.0%
Owner occupied
50.0%
100.0%
Renter occupied
50.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
32
Population
20
29
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

12
Schools nearby
13
899
Avg ICSEA
898

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).