Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kingsland vs Woodstock.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Woodstock edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Woodstock (940) sits above Kingsland (899).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Woodstock edges out on average school ICSEA (940 vs 899).

Common questionsKingsland vs Woodstock

Common questions

Does Kingsland or Woodstock have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Woodstock scores 940 vs 899 in Kingsland. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kingsland
Metric
Woodstock

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$225/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$270/wk
$100/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$230/wk
71.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
32
Population
14,995
29
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

12
Schools nearby
3
899
Avg ICSEA
940

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).