Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kippenduff vs Six Mile Swamp.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kippenduff edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kippenduff (884) sits above Six Mile Swamp (876).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kippenduff edges out on average school ICSEA (884 vs 876).

Common questionsKippenduff vs Six Mile Swamp

Common questions

Does Kippenduff or Six Mile Swamp have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kippenduff scores 884 vs 876 in Six Mile Swamp. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kippenduff
Metric
Six Mile Swamp

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$240/wk
$204/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$204/wk
83.0%
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
17
Population
4,359
66
Median age
54

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
4
884
Avg ICSEA
876

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).