Kippenduff vs Busbys Flat
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Busbys Flat (887) sits above Kippenduff (884). Busbys Flat skews owner-occupied (100%), Kippenduff runs more rental-dense (83% owner).
Buying in Kippenduff or Busbys Flat?
Selling in Kippenduff? The free selling guide
Kippenduff and Busbys Flat side by side
| Measure | Kippenduff | Busbys Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 83.0% | 100.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 9 | 12 |
| Average ICSEA | 884 | 887 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 17 | 57 |
| Median age | 66 | 52 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 1004 mm | 1003 mm |
| Mean max, January | 30.4°C | 30.5°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Busbys Flat edges out on average school ICSEA (887 vs 884).
Kippenduff vs Busbys Flat: common questions
Does Kippenduff or Busbys Flat have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Busbys Flat scores 887 vs 884 in Kippenduff. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Kippenduff with
Choosing between Kippenduff and Busbys Flat?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.