Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kippenduff vs Busbys Flat.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Busbys Flat edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Busbys Flat (887) sits above Kippenduff (884). Busbys Flat skews owner-occupied (100%), Kippenduff runs more rental-dense (83% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Busbys Flat edges out on average school ICSEA (887 vs 884).

Common questionsKippenduff vs Busbys Flat

Common questions

Does Kippenduff or Busbys Flat have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Busbys Flat scores 887 vs 884 in Kippenduff. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kippenduff
Metric
Busbys Flat

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$240/wk
$204/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$130/wk
83.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
17
Population
57
66
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
12
884
Avg ICSEA
887

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).