Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kundabung vs Burnt Bridge.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kundabung edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kundabung (880) sits above Burnt Bridge (861). Kundabung skews owner-occupied (92%), Burnt Bridge runs more rental-dense (39% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kundabung edges out on average school ICSEA (880 vs 861).

Common questionsKundabung vs Burnt Bridge

Common questions

Does Kundabung or Burnt Bridge have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kundabung scores 880 vs 861 in Burnt Bridge. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kundabung
Metric
Burnt Bridge

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$290/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$280/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$178/wk
92.0%
Owner occupied
39.0%
9.0%
Renter occupied
21.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
30
616
Population
110
45
Median age
30

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

14
Schools nearby
11
880
Avg ICSEA
861

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).