Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kundabung vs Cooperabung.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cooperabung edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cooperabung (974) sits above Kundabung (880). Kundabung skews owner-occupied (92%), Cooperabung runs more rental-dense (77% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cooperabung edges out on average school ICSEA (974 vs 880).

Common questionsKundabung vs Cooperabung

Common questions

Does Kundabung or Cooperabung have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cooperabung scores 974 vs 880 in Kundabung. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kundabung
Metric
Cooperabung

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$290/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$290/wk
$280/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$400/wk
92.0%
Owner occupied
77.0%
9.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
616
Population
293
45
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

14
Schools nearby
20
880
Avg ICSEA
974

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).