Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lane Cove North vs Artarmon.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $2,510,000 and $3,600,000.

Lane Cove North (median $2,510,000) is roughly 30% cheaper to buy into than Artarmon ($3,600,000). Over the past year, Artarmon (+9.4%) ran 22.3 percentage points ahead of Lane Cove North (-12.9%) on house-price growth.

Artarmon scores higher on walkability (94/100 vs 100/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lane Cove North (1154) sits above Artarmon (1149). Lane Cove North skews owner-occupied (58%), Artarmon runs more rental-dense (48% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Lane Cove North is the lower entry point at $2,510,000 median, 30% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Lane Cove North delivers the better gross yield (2.69% vs 1.66%), but Artarmon has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Lane Cove North edges out on average school ICSEA (1154 vs 1149).

Common questionsLane Cove North vs Artarmon

Common questions

Is Lane Cove North or Artarmon cheaper to buy in?

Lane Cove North has the lower median house price at $2,510,000, roughly 30% below Artarmon ($3,600,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Lane Cove North or Artarmon?

Over the past 12 months, Artarmon grew +9.4% vs -12.9% in Lane Cove North, a gap of 22.3 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Lane Cove North or Artarmon have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lane Cove North scores 1154 vs 1149 in Artarmon. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Lane Cove North or Artarmon?

Artarmon scores 100/100 on walkability vs 94/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Lane Cove North or Artarmon?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.69% in Lane Cove North vs 1.66% in Artarmon. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Lane Cove North
Metric
Artarmon

Price & Market

$2,510,000
Median house
$3,600,000
$475,200
Median unit
$1,022,000
-12.9%
Annual growth (house)
+9.4%
Days on market

Rental

$1300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$1150/wk
$770/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$800/wk
58.0%
Owner occupied
48.0%
40.0%
Renter occupied
50.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

94
Walk score
100
0
Transit score
20
100
Bike score
100
11,773
Population
9,417
36
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1154
Avg ICSEA
1149

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).