Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lane Cove North vs Chatswood West.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lane Cove North edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Lane Cove North scores higher on walkability (94/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lane Cove North (1154) sits above Chatswood West (1152). Chatswood West skews owner-occupied (83%), Lane Cove North runs more rental-dense (58% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lane Cove North edges out on average school ICSEA (1154 vs 1152). Chatswood West also has a higher family-household share (84% vs 64%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsLane Cove North vs Chatswood West

Common questions

Does Lane Cove North or Chatswood West have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lane Cove North scores 1154 vs 1152 in Chatswood West. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Lane Cove North or Chatswood West?

Lane Cove North scores 94/100 on walkability vs 8/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Lane Cove North
Metric
Chatswood West

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$520/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$580/wk
$480/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$750/wk
58.0%
Owner occupied
83.0%
40.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

94
Walk score
8
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
11,773
Population
1,521
36
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1154
Avg ICSEA
1152

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).