Macquarie Fields vs Glenfield.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $859,000 and $1,027,500. Macquarie Fields edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Macquarie Fields (median $859,000) is roughly 16% cheaper to buy into than Glenfield ($1,027,500). Over the past year, Macquarie Fields (+7.6%) ran 4.6 percentage points ahead of Glenfield (+3%) on house-price growth.
Macquarie Fields scores higher on walkability (28/100 vs 6/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Macquarie Fields (987) sits above Glenfield (980). Glenfield skews owner-occupied (64%), Macquarie Fields runs more rental-dense (54% owner).
For buyers
Macquarie Fields is the lower entry point at $859,000 median, 16% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Glenfield delivers the better gross yield (3.47% vs 2.06%), but Macquarie Fields has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.
For families
Macquarie Fields edges out on average school ICSEA (987 vs 980).
Common questions
Is Macquarie Fields or Glenfield cheaper to buy in?
Macquarie Fields has the lower median house price at $859,000, roughly 16% below Glenfield ($1,027,500). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Which has stronger property growth, Macquarie Fields or Glenfield?
Over the past 12 months, Macquarie Fields grew +7.6% vs +3% in Glenfield, a gap of 4.6 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.
Does Macquarie Fields or Glenfield have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Macquarie Fields scores 987 vs 980 in Glenfield. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Macquarie Fields or Glenfield?
Macquarie Fields scores 28/100 on walkability vs 6/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
Which suburb has higher rental yield, Macquarie Fields or Glenfield?
Gross rental yield on houses is 3.47% in Glenfield vs 2.06% in Macquarie Fields. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Macquarie Fields against another suburb