Side by sideSuburb comparison

Macquarie Fields vs Long Point.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,000,000 and $2,700,000. Macquarie Fields edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Macquarie Fields (median $1,000,000) is roughly 63% cheaper to buy into than Long Point ($2,700,000). Over the past year, Macquarie Fields (+13%) ran 0.5 percentage points ahead of Long Point (+12.5%) on house-price growth.

Macquarie Fields scores higher on walkability (28/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Long Point (999) sits above Macquarie Fields (987).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Macquarie Fields is the lower entry point at $1,000,000 median, 63% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Macquarie Fields carries both higher gross yield (1.77% vs 0.65%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Long Point edges out on average school ICSEA (999 vs 987).

Common questionsMacquarie Fields vs Long Point

Common questions

Is Macquarie Fields or Long Point cheaper to buy in?

Macquarie Fields has the lower median house price at $1,000,000, roughly 63% below Long Point ($2,700,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Macquarie Fields or Long Point?

Over the past 12 months, Macquarie Fields grew +13% vs +12.5% in Long Point, a gap of 0.5 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Macquarie Fields or Long Point have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Long Point scores 999 vs 987 in Macquarie Fields. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Macquarie Fields or Long Point?

Macquarie Fields scores 28/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Macquarie Fields or Long Point?

Gross rental yield on houses is 1.77% in Macquarie Fields vs 0.65% in Long Point. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Macquarie Fields
Metric
Long Point

Price & Market

$1,000,000
Median house
$2,700,000
$609,000
Median unit
$285,120
+13.0%
Annual growth (house)
+12.5%
Days on market

Rental

$340/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$340/wk
$340/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$289/wk
54.0%
Owner occupied
43.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

28
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
55
14,023
Population
14,198
36
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
987
Avg ICSEA
999

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).