Side by sideSuburb comparison

Magenta vs Gorokan.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Magenta edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Magenta (948) sits above Gorokan (942). Magenta skews owner-occupied (73%), Gorokan runs more rental-dense (60% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Magenta edges out on average school ICSEA (948 vs 942). Magenta also has a higher family-household share (73% vs 63%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMagenta vs Gorokan

Common questions

Does Magenta or Gorokan have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Magenta scores 948 vs 942 in Gorokan. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Magenta
Metric
Gorokan

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$385/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$350/wk
$550/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$350/wk
73.0%
Owner occupied
60.0%
25.0%
Renter occupied
37.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
10
Bike score
10
332
Population
8,624
60
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

18
Schools nearby
20
948
Avg ICSEA
942

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).