Marcoola vs Mudjimba

Mudjimba scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 24/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Mudjimba skews owner-occupied (69%), Marcoola runs more rental-dense (58% owner).

Buying in Marcoola or Mudjimba?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Marcoola? The free selling guide

Marcoola and Mudjimba side by side

MeasureMarcoolaMudjimba
Renting
House rent$433/wk–
Unit rent$750/wk–
Owner occupied58.0%69.0%
Renter occupied40.0%29.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1415
Average ICSEA10521052
Lifestyle and people
Walk score024
Transit score00
Bike score30100
Population3,3552,664
Median age4544
Climate
Annual rainfall1543 mm1486 mm
Mean max, January29.3°C29.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Mudjimba has a heavier family-household mix (75% vs 65%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Marcoola vs Mudjimba: common questions

Which is more walkable, Marcoola or Mudjimba?

Mudjimba scores 24/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.