Side by sideSuburb comparison

Marcoola vs Maroochy River.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Marcoola edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Marcoola (1052) sits above Maroochy River (1033). Maroochy River skews owner-occupied (82%), Marcoola runs more rental-dense (58% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Marcoola edges out on average school ICSEA (1052 vs 1033). Maroochy River also has a higher family-household share (85% vs 65%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMarcoola vs Maroochy River

Common questions

Does Marcoola or Maroochy River have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Marcoola scores 1052 vs 1033 in Maroochy River. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Marcoola
Metric
Maroochy River

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$433/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$400/wk
$650/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$460/wk
58.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
40.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
30
Bike score
100
3,355
Population
1,667
45
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

14
Schools nearby
18
1052
Avg ICSEA
1033

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).