Side by sideSuburb comparison

Marsden Park vs Berkshire Park.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,165,000 and $2,300,000. Marsden Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Marsden Park (median $1,165,000) is roughly 49% cheaper to buy into than Berkshire Park ($2,300,000). Over the past year, Marsden Park (+14%) ran 33.3 percentage points ahead of Berkshire Park (-19.3%) on house-price growth.

Marsden Park scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Berkshire Park (982) sits above Marsden Park (968).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Marsden Park is the lower entry point at $1,165,000 median, 49% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Marsden Park carries both higher gross yield (3.79% vs 1.92%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Berkshire Park edges out on average school ICSEA (982 vs 968).

Common questionsMarsden Park vs Berkshire Park

Common questions

Is Marsden Park or Berkshire Park cheaper to buy in?

Marsden Park has the lower median house price at $1,165,000, roughly 49% below Berkshire Park ($2,300,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Marsden Park or Berkshire Park?

Over the past 12 months, Marsden Park grew +14% vs -19.3% in Berkshire Park, a gap of 33.3 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Marsden Park or Berkshire Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Berkshire Park scores 982 vs 968 in Marsden Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Marsden Park or Berkshire Park?

Marsden Park scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Marsden Park or Berkshire Park?

Gross rental yield on houses is 3.79% in Marsden Park vs 1.92% in Berkshire Park. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Marsden Park
Metric
Berkshire Park

Price & Market

$1,165,000
Median house
$2,300,000
$446,400
Median unit
$446,400
+14.0%
Annual growth (house)
-19.3%
Days on market

Rental

$850/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$850/wk
$560/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$560/wk
77.0%
Owner occupied
70.0%
21.0%
Renter occupied
29.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
25
14,610
Population
2,149
32
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
968
Avg ICSEA
982

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).