Mascot vs St Peters Dc.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.
Mascot scores higher on walkability (100/100 vs 66/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving St Peters Dc (1093) sits above Mascot (1071).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
St Peters Dc edges out on average school ICSEA (1093 vs 1071).
Common questions
Does Mascot or St Peters Dc have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), St Peters Dc scores 1093 vs 1071 in Mascot. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Mascot or St Peters Dc?
Mascot scores 100/100 on walkability vs 66/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Mascot against another suburb