Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mccrae vs Arthurs Seat.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mccrae edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mccrae (1001) sits above Arthurs Seat (999). Arthurs Seat skews owner-occupied (91%), Mccrae runs more rental-dense (81% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mccrae edges out on average school ICSEA (1001 vs 999).

Common questionsMccrae vs Arthurs Seat

Common questions

Does Mccrae or Arthurs Seat have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mccrae scores 1001 vs 999 in Arthurs Seat. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mccrae
Metric
Arthurs Seat

Price & Market

$1,455,000
Median house
$965,000
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$392/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$405/wk
$392/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$435/wk
81.0%
Owner occupied
91.0%
15.0%
Renter occupied
9.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
2
0
Transit score
0
85
Bike score
75
3,311
Population
414
55
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

12
Schools nearby
11
1001
Avg ICSEA
999

Climate

612 mm
Annual rainfall
612 mm
25.3°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.3°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).