Side by sideSuburb comparison

Metford vs Chisholm.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $732,500 and $932,500. Metford edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Metford (median $732,500) is roughly 21% cheaper to buy into than Chisholm ($932,500). Over the past year, Metford (+9.7%) ran 6.1 percentage points ahead of Chisholm (+3.6%) on house-price growth.

Metford scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Metford (1001) sits above Chisholm (994). Chisholm skews owner-occupied (79%), Metford runs more rental-dense (60% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Metford is the lower entry point at $732,500 median, 21% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Metford carries both higher gross yield (4.54% vs 3.79%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Metford edges out on average school ICSEA (1001 vs 994). Chisholm also has a higher family-household share (92% vs 72%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMetford vs Chisholm

Common questions

Is Metford or Chisholm cheaper to buy in?

Metford has the lower median house price at $732,500, roughly 21% below Chisholm ($932,500). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Metford or Chisholm?

Over the past 12 months, Metford grew +9.7% vs +3.6% in Chisholm, a gap of 6.1 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Metford or Chisholm have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Metford scores 1001 vs 994 in Chisholm. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Metford or Chisholm?

Metford scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Metford or Chisholm?

Gross rental yield on houses is 4.54% in Metford vs 3.79% in Chisholm. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Metford
Metric
Chisholm

Price & Market

$732,500
Median house
$932,500
$274,320
Median unit
$285,120
+9.7%
Annual growth (house)
+3.6%
Days on market

Rental

$640/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$680/wk
$480/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$510/wk
60.0%
Owner occupied
79.0%
38.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
15
4,707
Population
4,577
35
Median age
32

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1001
Avg ICSEA
994

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).