Side by sideSuburb comparison

Middle Camp vs Cams Wharf.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cams Wharf edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cams Wharf (981) sits above Middle Camp (979).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cams Wharf edges out on average school ICSEA (981 vs 979).

Common questionsMiddle Camp vs Cams Wharf

Common questions

Does Middle Camp or Cams Wharf have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cams Wharf scores 981 vs 979 in Middle Camp. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Middle Camp
Metric
Cams Wharf

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$370/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$370/wk
$315/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$430/wk
Owner occupied
77.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
30
Bike score
55
15,323
Population
182
49
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

17
Schools nearby
20
979
Avg ICSEA
981

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).