Mitchell Park vs Oaklands Park

Oaklands Park (median $955,000) is roughly 2% cheaper to buy into than Mitchell Park ($970,000). Over the past year, Mitchell Park (+12.8%) ran 13.1 percentage points ahead of Oaklands Park (-0.3%) on house-price growth.

Buying in Mitchell Park or Oaklands Park?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Mitchell Park? The free selling guide

Mitchell Park and Oaklands Park side by side

MeasureMitchell ParkOaklands Park
Price and market
Median house$970,000$955,000
Median unit$255,600$274,320
House price change, 12 months+12.8%-0.3%
Renting
House rent$687/wk$700/wk
Unit rent$490/wk$515/wk
Owner occupied47.0%48.0%
Renter occupied50.0%48.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA10591060
Lifestyle and people
Walk score10058
Transit score00
Bike score100100
Population5,7543,948
Median age3739
Climate
Annual rainfall466 mm466 mm
Mean max, January28.8°C28.8°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

Mitchell Park scores higher on walkability (100/100 vs 58/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Oaklands Park (1060) sits above Mitchell Park (1059).

For buyers
Oaklands Park is the lower entry point at $955,000 median, 2% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Oaklands Park delivers the better gross yield (3.81% vs 3.68%), but Mitchell Park has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.
For families
Oaklands Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1060 vs 1059).

Mitchell Park vs Oaklands Park: common questions

Is Mitchell Park or Oaklands Park cheaper to buy in?

Oaklands Park has the lower median house price at $955,000, roughly 2% below Mitchell Park ($970,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Mitchell Park or Oaklands Park?

Over the past 12 months, Mitchell Park grew +12.8% vs -0.3% in Oaklands Park, a gap of 13.1 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Mitchell Park or Oaklands Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Oaklands Park scores 1060 vs 1059 in Mitchell Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Mitchell Park or Oaklands Park?

Mitchell Park scores 100/100 on walkability vs 58/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Mitchell Park or Oaklands Park?

Gross rental yield on houses is 3.81% in Oaklands Park vs 3.68% in Mitchell Park. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.