Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mitchell Park vs Bedford Park.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,170,500 and $987,500. Mitchell Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Bedford Park (median $987,500) is roughly 19% cheaper to buy into than Mitchell Park ($1,170,500). Over the past year, Mitchell Park (+23.4%) ran 11.2 percentage points ahead of Bedford Park (+12.2%) on house-price growth.

Mitchell Park scores higher on walkability (100/100 vs 34/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mitchell Park (1059) sits above Bedford Park (1056).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Bedford Park is the lower entry point at $987,500 median, 19% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Mitchell Park carries both higher gross yield (2.75% vs 1.47%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Mitchell Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1059 vs 1056).

Common questionsMitchell Park vs Bedford Park

Common questions

Is Mitchell Park or Bedford Park cheaper to buy in?

Bedford Park has the lower median house price at $987,500, roughly 19% below Mitchell Park ($1,170,500). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Mitchell Park or Bedford Park?

Over the past 12 months, Mitchell Park grew +23.4% vs +12.2% in Bedford Park, a gap of 11.2 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Mitchell Park or Bedford Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mitchell Park scores 1059 vs 1056 in Bedford Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Mitchell Park or Bedford Park?

Mitchell Park scores 100/100 on walkability vs 34/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Mitchell Park or Bedford Park?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.75% in Mitchell Park vs 1.47% in Bedford Park. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Mitchell Park
Metric
Bedford Park

Price & Market

$1,170,500
Median house
$987,500
$255,600
Median unit
$257,760
+23.4%
Annual growth (house)
+12.2%
Days on market

Rental

$620/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$280/wk
$460/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$450/wk
47.0%
Owner occupied
47.0%
50.0%
Renter occupied
52.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

100
Walk score
34
0
Transit score
30
100
Bike score
100
5,754
Population
1,882
37
Median age
28

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1059
Avg ICSEA
1056

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).