Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mongans Bridge vs Running Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Running Creek edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Running Creek (1025) sits above Mongans Bridge (1021).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Running Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (1025 vs 1021).

Common questionsMongans Bridge vs Running Creek

Common questions

Does Mongans Bridge or Running Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Running Creek scores 1025 vs 1021 in Mongans Bridge. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mongans Bridge
Metric
Running Creek

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$340/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$340/wk
$260/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$289/wk
48.0%
Owner occupied
17.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
49
Population
12,771
47
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
20
1021
Avg ICSEA
1025

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).