Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mongans Bridge vs Upper Gundowring.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mongans Bridge edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mongans Bridge (1021) sits above Upper Gundowring (1017). Upper Gundowring skews owner-occupied (88%), Mongans Bridge runs more rental-dense (48% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mongans Bridge edges out on average school ICSEA (1021 vs 1017). Upper Gundowring also has a higher family-household share (71% vs 52%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMongans Bridge vs Upper Gundowring

Common questions

Does Mongans Bridge or Upper Gundowring have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mongans Bridge scores 1021 vs 1017 in Upper Gundowring. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mongans Bridge
Metric
Upper Gundowring

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$340/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$340/wk
$260/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
48.0%
Owner occupied
88.0%
17.0%
Renter occupied
14.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
49
Population
120
47
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
20
1021
Avg ICSEA
1017

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).