Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Beauty vs Smoko.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Smoko edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Smoko (1054) sits above Mount Beauty (1034). Smoko skews owner-occupied (83%), Mount Beauty runs more rental-dense (71% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Smoko edges out on average school ICSEA (1054 vs 1034). Smoko also has a higher family-household share (70% vs 54%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMount Beauty vs Smoko

Common questions

Does Mount Beauty or Smoko have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Smoko scores 1054 vs 1034 in Mount Beauty. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Beauty
Metric
Smoko

Price & Market

$480,000
Median house
$144,000
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$280/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$270/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$260/wk
71.0%
Owner occupied
83.0%
27.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
2
Transit score
0
Bike score
5
910
Population
56
48
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
8
1034
Avg ICSEA
1054

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).