Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Beauty vs Tawonga.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Tawonga skews owner-occupied (87%), Mount Beauty runs more rental-dense (71% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Tawonga has a heavier family-household mix (71% vs 54%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Mount Beauty
Metric
Tawonga

Price & Market

$480,000
Median house
$144,000
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$280/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$270/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$220/wk
71.0%
Owner occupied
87.0%
27.0%
Renter occupied
7.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
Transit score
Bike score
910
Population
568
48
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
3
1034
Avg ICSEA
1034

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).