Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Napier vs Byaduk North.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mount Napier edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Napier (990) sits above Byaduk North (988). Mount Napier skews owner-occupied (175%), Byaduk North runs more rental-dense (80% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Napier edges out on average school ICSEA (990 vs 988).

Common questionsMount Napier vs Byaduk North

Common questions

Does Mount Napier or Byaduk North have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Napier scores 990 vs 988 in Byaduk North. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Napier
Metric
Byaduk North

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$236/wk
$170/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$325/wk
175.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
Renter occupied
10.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
16
Population
134
31
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
12
990
Avg ICSEA
988

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).