Mount Napier vs Byaduk
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Byaduk (993) sits above Mount Napier (990). Mount Napier skews owner-occupied (175%), Byaduk runs more rental-dense (93% owner).
Buying in Mount Napier or Byaduk?
Selling in Mount Napier? The free selling guide
Mount Napier and Byaduk side by side
| Measure | Mount Napier | Byaduk |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 175.0% | 93.0% |
| Renter occupied | – | 11.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 11 | 3 |
| Average ICSEA | 990 | 993 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 16 | 129 |
| Median age | 31 | 53 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 700 mm | 666 mm |
| Mean max, January | 25.2°C | 25.4°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Byaduk edges out on average school ICSEA (993 vs 990).
Mount Napier vs Byaduk: common questions
Does Mount Napier or Byaduk have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Byaduk scores 993 vs 990 in Mount Napier. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Mount Napier with
Choosing between Mount Napier and Byaduk?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.