Nabiac vs Failford.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $625,000 and $1,125,000. Failford edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Nabiac (median $625,000) is roughly 44% cheaper to buy into than Failford ($1,125,000). Over the past year, Failford (-10.9%) ran 2.9 percentage points ahead of Nabiac (-13.8%) on house-price growth.
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Failford (958) sits above Nabiac (956).
For buyers
Nabiac is the lower entry point at $625,000 median, 44% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Failford has run faster on 12-month capital growth, favouring growth-led investors.
For families
Failford edges out on average school ICSEA (958 vs 956).
Common questions
Is Nabiac or Failford cheaper to buy in?
Nabiac has the lower median house price at $625,000, roughly 44% below Failford ($1,125,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Which has stronger property growth, Nabiac or Failford?
Over the past 12 months, Failford grew -10.9% vs -13.8% in Nabiac, a gap of 2.9 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.
Does Nabiac or Failford have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Failford scores 958 vs 956 in Nabiac. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Nabiac against another suburb