Side by sideSuburb comparison

Nile vs Deddington.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Deddington edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Deddington (998) sits above Nile (988). Deddington skews owner-occupied (81%), Nile runs more rental-dense (54% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Deddington edges out on average school ICSEA (998 vs 988).

Common questionsNile vs Deddington

Common questions

Does Nile or Deddington have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Deddington scores 998 vs 988 in Nile. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Nile
Metric
Deddington

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$273/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$273/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
54.0%
Owner occupied
81.0%
33.0%
Renter occupied
26.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
121
Population
85
48
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
988
Avg ICSEA
998

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).