Side by sideSuburb comparison

Nippering vs Dongolocking.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Dongolocking edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Dongolocking (1010) sits above Nippering (984). Nippering skews owner-occupied (160%), Dongolocking runs more rental-dense (88% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Dongolocking edges out on average school ICSEA (1010 vs 984). Nippering also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 82%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsNippering vs Dongolocking

Common questions

Does Nippering or Dongolocking have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Dongolocking scores 1010 vs 984 in Nippering. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Nippering
Metric
Dongolocking

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$150/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$180/wk
$128/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$153/wk
160.0%
Owner occupied
88.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
21
Population
53
42
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
2
984
Avg ICSEA
1010

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).