Side by sideSuburb comparison

Nippering vs Ballaying.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Nippering edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Nippering (984) sits above Ballaying (931). Nippering skews owner-occupied (160%), Ballaying runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Nippering edges out on average school ICSEA (984 vs 931). Nippering also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 60%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsNippering vs Ballaying

Common questions

Does Nippering or Ballaying have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Nippering scores 984 vs 931 in Ballaying. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Nippering
Metric
Ballaying

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$150/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$180/wk
$128/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$153/wk
160.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
21
Population
33
42
Median age
53

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
7
984
Avg ICSEA
931

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).