Officer vs Beaconsfield.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $750,000 and $960,000.
Officer (median $750,000) is roughly 22% cheaper to buy into than Beaconsfield ($960,000).
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Beaconsfield (1066) sits above Officer (1023).
For buyers
Officer is the lower entry point at $750,000 median, 22% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Officer offers the higher gross rental yield (2.75% vs 2.11%), favouring cash-flow investors.
For families
Beaconsfield edges out on average school ICSEA (1066 vs 1023).
Common questions
Is Officer or Beaconsfield cheaper to buy in?
Officer has the lower median house price at $750,000, roughly 22% below Beaconsfield ($960,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Does Officer or Beaconsfield have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Beaconsfield scores 1066 vs 1023 in Officer. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which suburb has higher rental yield, Officer or Beaconsfield?
Gross rental yield on houses is 2.75% in Officer vs 2.11% in Beaconsfield. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Officer against another suburb